View Mobile Site

Ask the Expert

Signal Photos


Horton’s prejudiced half-truths

Posted: February 28, 2010 10:21 p.m.
Updated: March 1, 2010 4:55 a.m.

Regarding Gary Horton’s recent opinion piece “They got between me and my doctor” (The Signal, Feb. 17), I feel obliged to respond.

As a physician with more than 50 years experience, I felt that the column was full of half-truths, prejudiced statements and unwarranted innuendo.

True, $350 is about the right cost for the average MRI without IVs, contrast medications, etc.

* What was the suspected diagnosis?

* Was MRI the correct test?

* What would the writer have said if pain medication, steroids and time had solved the problem?

I find fault with your assertion that health care decisions are made by some “kid in a cubicle” who makes $10 per hour. I have an associate doing this for $100 per hour.

Exorbitant rates for private health insurance will probably negatively impact the state of a person’s health.

Why didn’t Horton address the issue of “for-profit” health insurance? This makes about as much sense as for-profit police or fire departments.

We are the only industrialized country in the world without national health care. The United Kingdom, Canada, France and Germany, to name a few, are countries where the quality of care is quite good.

I sincerely hope Horton’s hop is better with or without an MRI.


Most Popular Articles

There are no articles at this time.
Commenting not available.
Commenting is not available.


Powered By
Morris Technology
Please wait ...